Despite ongoing modernization efforts, same-level railway crossings remain common in many European countries, particularly those with older railway systems. Financial and geographical constraints often limit the ability to eliminate these crossings entirely.
Ensuring the safety of railway crossings in Europe is paramount, not only for the protection of passengers but also to mitigate delays caused by track closures following collisions or potential hazards. With Europe’s rail network spanning approximately 233,400 kilometers, countries like Germany, France, and Poland account for a significant portion of this infrastructure. The continent’s railways serve millions daily, with Germany alone transporting over 1.4 billion passengers in the first half of 2024. As rail traffic intensifies, the risk at crossings increases, making it essential to implement advanced safety measures. Prioritizing the modernization and security of railway crossings will not only safeguard lives but also enhance the efficiency and reliability of Europe’s vital rail services. [1] [2]
Reports from European railway authorities highlight the following:
The prevalence of level crossings is directly linked to accident trends. Nations with a high number of such crossings tend to experience more railway-related accidents. According to the 2023 Railway Safety Statistics published by the European Commission, 26% of railway-related deaths in the EU occur at level crossings, even though they represent a small portion of total road crossings [4].
The safety of level crossings is influenced by several factors, including infrastructure condition, safety protocols, and public awareness. Despite progress in recent years, accidents at these crossings remain a significant concern. The European Union Agency for Railways (ERA) reports that level crossings contribute significantly to fatal railway accidents annually [5].
Common Causes of Accidents:
Although safety precautions have improved, the inherent risks of same-level crossings make them a temporary solution rather than a permanent feature of modern railway systems.
The cost of stopping a long-distance train due to a collision at a railway crossing can be staggering. When a train strikes an abandoned object or a vehicle that has unlawfully entered the crossing, the financial impact extends far beyond immediate damages. Depending on the severity of the incident, expenses can include infrastructure repairs, rolling stock maintenance, operational disruptions, and compensation for delays, often amounting to €50,000 to €500,000 per event. In contrast, if the train were able to stop in time—allowing the obstruction to be cleared—the financial losses would be drastically lower, typically limited to €5,000 to €20,000 for minor delays and response efforts. Instead of hours-long track closures and extensive recovery costs, proactive measures such as advanced detection systems and intelligent traffic management could keep both passengers and freight moving efficiently. Investing in these technologies is not just about safety—it’s a strategic decision that shields rail operators from significant economic losses.
Advancements in technology have played a crucial role in reducing risks at level crossings. Key innovations include:
Red light enforcement at railway crossings – Modern enforcement systems use AI-powered cameras and automated number plate recognition (ANPR) to detect and penalize drivers who ignore red lights, enhancing deterrence and compliance.
Stop sign violation enforcement at railway crossings – Smart surveillance systems equipped with motion sensors and video analytics identify vehicles that fail to stop at designated crossings, enabling authorities to issue fines and improve safety.
These technologies not only enhance safety but also improve the efficiency of railway operations.
Integrating technological data is essential not only for ensuring passenger safety but also for minimizing the duration that railway crossing barriers remain closed. Prolonged closures can lead to driver frustration and risky behaviors, such as attempting to cross before barriers are fully raised. Studies suggest that keeping closures under three minutes can reduce such violations. [6]. On busy railway lines, crossings may close multiple times per hour, with each closure lasting several minutes, depending on train frequency and speed. By leveraging real-time data and predictive analytics, it’s possible to optimize barrier operation times, reducing unnecessary delays and enhancing overall traffic flow. This approach not only improves safety but also addresses one of the root causes of level crossing incidents: driver impatience due to extended waiting periods.
The insurance industry plays a vital role in addressing the financial implications of accidents at level crossings. Collaboration between railway operators and insurers can drive safety improvements:
By working together, the railway and insurance sectors can create a safer and more sustainable transportation system.
The rise of high-speed railways, which often eliminate level crossings altogether, raises questions about the future relevance of same-level crossings. In developed regions, advanced rail systems have made level crossings increasingly obsolete. However, rural and underdeveloped areas are likely to retain these crossings for years, continuing to pose safety challenges.
As technologies like autonomous vehicles and smart cities evolve, innovative solutions will be necessary to ensure the coexistence of roadways and railways. The European Union’s commitment to sustainability and carbon reduction may also drive investments in safer and more efficient railway systems, ultimately phasing out hazardous crossings [3].
Same-level railway crossings in Europe present a complex challenge: they are essential to many railway systems but carry significant safety risks. Addressing these risks requires continuous investment in infrastructure, technological advancements, and collaboration with industries like insurance. While high-speed railways are gradually reducing the number of crossings, those that remain will require ongoing attention to ensure safety. Lessons learned from managing these crossings will shape the future of railway safety practices in Europe.
References
